10/8/12

"Meeting, Overcoming and Understanding Life’s Challenges" - Patient Profile of Rucha Shah

For 25-year-old Rucha Shah, the hardest part of living with thalassemia is the impact it has on her family.  


“The most difficult thing for my family is making sure that I am healthy and will remain healthy in the near future,” Rucha explained. “Most parents of young adults do not have to worry about that.”Rucha Shah

It’s hard to overstate the strain on families from a lifelong blood disorder like thalassemia. Rucha and her family have worked hard to maintain good health ever since she was diagnosed at just seven months old.
The Shah family was living in Mumbai, India at the time. Under the care of a local hematologist, Rucha underwent regular blood transfusions and took a chelation medication called L1 (also known as deferiprone)  to keep her iron levels under control. Iron buildup in vital organs, particularly the heart, is one of the main causes of early fatality for patients like Rucha.

Rucha’s family kept up-to-date about the latest research, medications and other information through newsletters from the Cooley ’s Anemia Foundation (CAF), which they learned about through one of their relatives. Especially early on, these newsletters were helpful in guiding family decisions about their daughter’s well being.

banner
Rucha 
"Thalassemia, although a huge part of my life, does not dictate it.”

When she was 16, her hematologist placed her on a more aggressive regimen of iron-chelating medications, adding Desferal injections to Rucha’s routine. That meant enduring almost-daily needle jabs and between eight and 12 hours of being attached to a subcutaneous injection pump. And that’s one of the hardest things for parents of children with thalassemia: the treatments require long stretches of time and are often painful.
Rucha’s treatment regimen became even more complicated at age 18, when her family immigrated from Mumbai to the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area in 2005. The L1 medication that she’d taken all her life hadn’t yet been approved in the United States (it received FDA approval in 2011 and is now available), and so she had to depend solely on Desferal injections. In 2006, she began using a newly approved oral chelation medication called Exjade, and has been taking it ever since.

In addition to the difficulty of switching medications, Rucha had to contend with the challenges of life in a new country.

The hardest thing was settling down, making new friends and understanding new culture,” Rucha said. “And there’s the added difficulty of explaining to friends that I have thalassemia.”

“And there are also physical difficulties,” she continued. “At the end of the day, I just want to go home and crash in my bed, especially few days before my next transfusion. I see my friends go out and have a good time after work or school is over. That is hard for me.”
banner

Difficulties aside, Rucha was determined to meet all of these challenges, and more. With resolve and support from her family, she went to college to study the very things that had both complicated her life and helped keep her healthy.
Rucha & Family 
I am as optimistic and capable of achieving my dreams as anybody else.”
   

“I received my Bachelor of Science degree in biochemistry. And right now, I’m considering post-graduate studies in biomedical sciences, clinical or basic research,” she explained. “I have always been fascinated by how our body works and how genes, proteins and biochemical messengers send signals to various parts of our body.”

It’s always difficult for a family – and especially a child – to understand illnesses and why their bodies don’t always work the way other peoples’ bodies do. Rucha Shah, whose life has involved all kinds of medications and treatments, is trying to develop a deeper understanding of those things, in the hope of helping others like herself and her family. She’s still receiving helpful information and social support from CAF to help her along the way.

I am as optimistic and capable of achieving my dreams as anybody else,” Rucha said. “Thalassemia, although a huge part of my life, does not dictate it.”
Help CAF Keep Helping Patients Like Rucha. Click Here to Make an Online Donation.
Story:
Roger Burks
____
Photos:
Thatcher Hullerman Cook

Mechanical treatment shows promise in thalassemia

By Laura Cowen
Vibration therapy may be an effective nonpharmacologic intervention to increase bone mass in patients with thalassemia, US researchers report.
The pilot study, conducted among nine adults (age >18 years) and nine adolescents (age 10-18 years), showed that standing on a vibrating platform (30 Hz, 0.3g) for 20 minutes per day for 6 months increased whole-body bone mineral content (BMC) by a significant 2.6% compared with baseline.
Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and BMC/height, both measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, increased by a significant 1.3% and 2.6%, respectively, during the intervention period, and remained elevated at 12 months.
Furthermore, the rate of change in hip BMD during the 6-month intervention in adults was significantly greater than the change observed in the year before study entry (2.2 vs -2.7%).
"Though these data are preliminary, they suggest promise of a non-invasive intervention in a group of patients who have a significant risk of osteoporosis morbidity," remark Ellen Fung (Children's Hospital and Research Center, Oakland, California) and co-authors in the American Journal of Hematology.
Fung and team explain that patients with thalassemia have low bone mass, which can lead to fracture and decreased quality of life.
Patients are commonly treated for hypogondism through hormonal supplementation and encouraged to take calcium and vitamin D, but the majority continue to lose bone, as much as 1% to 2% per year, as they age.
Mechanical stimulation through whole-body vibration has been shown to promote bone formation in previous studies, the researchers therefore tested its efficacy in thalassemia.
The increases in aBMD and BMC were accompanied by significant increases in levels of the bone formation marker osteocalcin and decreases in the bone resorption marker serum collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide.
Of note, although aBMD and BMC increased during the intervention period among adolescents, the increase was no greater than that recorded in the 6 months prior to the intervention. This was possibly because adolescents were captured during a period of rapid growth and pubertal development, limiting the ability to observe change, Fung et al remark.
They conclude: "Future research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger sample for longer duration."
Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Haploidentical bone marrow transplants for sickle cell disease: an interview with Dr. Javier Bolaños Meade

 Interview conducted by April Cashin-Garbutt, BA Hons (Cantab)

Please could you give a brief introduction to bone marrow transplants?

Bone marrow transplant (also called stem cell transplant) is a medical intervention that allows a physician to deliver very high doses of chemotherapy (if needed) but more importantly, deliver a new immune system to the patient to fight a disease (such as cancer).
For instance, if a patient has leukaemia, and I give that patient a transplant from a donor, he will get a new immune system that will fight the leukaemia, and will also get a new marrow to produce blood (the marrow is the part of the body in charge of making new blood).
In the case of patients with sickle cell disease (and related disorders) the important point is to replace the marrow that is producing defective red cells, for a new marrow that produces healthy red cells.

What exactly is a haploidentical bone marrow transplant?

Historically, in order to perform a bone marrow transplant, donor and recipient have to be 100% matched at the HLA genes level (human lymphocyte antigen). Many patients cannot get a transplant because they lack this matched donor.
But we have shown already in patients with cancer that they can receive a bone marrow transplant from a 50% match (or haploidentical). Over 90% of patients will have a sibling, child or parent that may be used as a donor and in the large majority (almost 100% but not quite) these first degree relatives will be at least 50% match. Therefore, if the patient’s sibling is not a perfect match but at last 50% may be still a good donor.

How did your work on haploidentical transplants for sickle cell disease originate?

Originally we start working on haploidentical transplants on patients with cancer (leukaemia, lymphoma, etc) at the end of the XX century – late 1990’s. Once we established that it was a safe procedure we wanted to test it in patients with non-malignant (non-cancer) conditions like sickle cell for which it is very difficult to find fully matched donors, either because their siblings are also affected, or they cannot find unrelated donors through registries like the National Marrow Donor Program. So, in these cases, a haploidentical transplant may be a good option.

How does a haploidentical bone marrow transplant eliminate sickle cell disease?

When we give new bone marrow to a patient, the donor’s immune system will allow the new marrow and immune system to establish its dominance in the recipient. Then, the donor’s marrow will start making new red cells that are healthy as opposed to those made by the sickle cell marrow.
The abnormal red cells in sickle cell cause many health problems. Once the new and healthy red cells are produced, one can expect that no new complications will develop. However, the damage already done by the sickle cell will not be reversed.

Does a haploidentical transplant always eliminate sickle cell disease or do some patients need a fully matched transplant?

We only performed a haploidentical transplant if the patient does not have a fully matched donor. But transplants do not always eliminate sickle cell. Approximately 50% of the haploidentical transplants done for sickle cell have been successful.

What are the benefits of a haploidentical bone marrow transplant?

Haploidentical transplant offers the possibility of finding donors for patients who otherwise would not be able to receive a transplant. Haploidentical donors (close relatives) are usually willing to donate and are usually readily available. It increases the pool of potential donors. In our study, a large majority of patients would not have received transplants without a haploidentical donor since they lacked a fully matched donor.

Are there any dangers of a haploidentical bone marrow transplant?

Yes, bone marrow transplant is a dangerous procedure that can be life threatening. Infections, graft-versus-host disease, organ toxicities are commonly seen after transplant and these can be very dangerous.

Are there any plans to use haploidentical bone marrow transplants for other conditions?

Currently at Johns Hopkins we have clinical trials with haploidentical transplants available for patients with blood cancers such as leukaemia, lymphoma, etc. We also have it available to patients with sickle cell disease and other haemoglobinopathies such as thalassemia. There are plans to expand to other diseases but that will be in the future.

How do you think the future of bone marrow transplants will develop?

The transplant community is actively researching ways to perform transplants with less toxic approaches, decreasing the rates of complications such as graft versus host disease. I think the areas receiving more attention now are:
  1. Alternative donors (such as haploidentical or cord cell grafts)
  2. Reduction of graft versus host disease

What plans do you have for further research in this field?

We are currently studying if increasing the number of cells infused in the graft will increase the success in patients undergoing transplants for sickle cell disease.

Would you like to make any further comments?

Despite the fact that transplantation is the only curative therapy for patients with sickle cell disease, it is not the only available option. Not all patients are candidates (either because they do not have severe enough disease or because their overall health is poor).

Where can readers find more information?

http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/search/view?cdrid=675373&version=HealthProfessional&protocolsearchid=10925161
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/half_match_bone_marrow_transplants_wipe_out_sickle_cell_disease_in_selected_patients

About Dr. Javier Bolaños Meade

Javier Bolaños Meade BIG IMAGEDr. Javier Bolaños Meade is the Associate Professor of Oncology at the Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center.
His expertise includes:
  • Bone Marrow Transplant
  • General Internal Medicine
  • Graft-versus-Host Disease
  • Hematologic Malignancies
His group is researching into finding novel therapies for the treatment of both acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD).